A hair- and skin-care store where every influencer code reports its own commission
What they were up against
A new organic hair- and skin-care brand going online, with influencers as a main route to customers. It needed a store of its own, and a straight answer to which influencer brought in which orders — and what each is owed.
What we shipped
A full store on the Mt7 platform: Hair Rituals and Skin Rituals with filters, search, cart and wishlist, customer accounts with Google sign-in and order history, coupons with limits and first-order rules, one code per influencer that shows its orders, revenue and commission, order and abandoned-cart emails, and a blog the team publishes from the admin panel. Mt7 hosts and maintains it; the domain, brand, content and customer data are BRK's.
What went wrong, and what we did
The build was never the slow part. The things only the owner can do — Razorpay's identity check, buying the domain, and supplying the brand kit — set the schedule, so the agreement starts the clock when the brand kit is complete rather than on signing. Saying so in writing kept a late start from turning into a late delivery.
What was asked for, and what was done
What actually shipped.
- Hair Rituals and Skin Rituals, with filters inside each, search, cart and wishlist.
- Customer accounts with Google sign-in, saved addresses, order history and reviews.
- Percentage and flat coupons with limits, expiry dates and first-order-only rules.
- One code per influencer, reporting the orders, revenue and commission it brought in.
- Order emails, launch coupons to customers who opted in, and abandoned-cart reminders.
How brkorganics.com scores
Measured on 16 Oct 2026 with Lighthouse 12.8.2, the engine behind Google's PageSpeed Insights: three runs on mobile and three on desktop. This is a lab test rather than data from real visitors, so treat it as a dated snapshot, and run it yourself if you want a second opinion.
Mobile
- Performance
- 91
- Accessibility
- 96
- Best practices
- 100
- SEO
- 100
Performance ranged 89–93 across 3 runs; the median run is shown.
Desktop
- Performance
- 98
- Accessibility
- 96
- Best practices
- 100
- SEO
- 100
Performance ranged 98–99 across 3 runs; the median run is shown.
| Measure | Mobile | Desktop |
|---|---|---|
| First Contentful Paint | 1.2 s | 0.3 s |
| Largest Contentful Paint | 3.4 s | 0.7 s |
| Total Blocking Time | 60 ms | 10 ms |
| Cumulative Layout Shift | 0 | 0 |
| Speed Index | 3.2 s | 1.4 s |
Checks that still fail (mobile)
- Accessibility: 1 of 28 fail — Touch targets do not have sufficient size or spacing.
- Best practices: all 14 pass
- SEO: all 10 pass
Largest savings still open (mobile)
- Properly size images · Est savings of 26 KiB
Talk to the founder, today.
WhatsApp, or leave a number and get a call back — usually the same day. No forms about budget, no sales team.